Legal Opinion

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation ("B&W”) has failed to overcome the qualified protection enjoyed by deponents-respondents concerning their newsgathering activities. The outtakes and unpublished materials sought by B&W, at least those dealing with the preparation and eventual broadcast of the CBS "60 Minutes” interview, relate directly to the allegation in the underlying Kentucky action that "[s]ince his termination from B&W, defendant Wigand has provided both in writing and orally, documents, materials and information acquired by him during and as a result of his employment…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flynn v. NYP Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Trump v. O'BRIENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  3. Kirkland & Ellis v. Chadbourne & Parke, L. L. P.New York Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Perito v. FinklesteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Giuffre v. MaxwellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API