Legal Opinion

Herman EDELMAN, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 7, 1996No. 95-5599PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security 1 rejecting Herman Edelman’s claim for social security benefits for the month of October 1993 presents the issue of the proper construction of the 1981 amendments to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) affecting the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. Because we determine that the district court correctly interpreted the statute and applicable regulations, and because Edelman cannot sustain his constitutional claim, we will affirm.

The parties…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bordes v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Kocher v. Larksville BoroughDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Bridges ex rel. D.B. v. Scranton School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Ward v. NoonanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API