Legal Opinion

State v. Wimbley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 20, 2021No. 122812PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,812 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JAMION D. WIMBLEY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT When deciding whether error occurred because a district court judge denied a request to modify a pattern instruction, an appellate court does not view the requested language in isolation. Rather, the appellate court considers the jury instructions as a whole and decides whether, even without language requested by a party, the instructions properly and fairly stated the applicable law or whether it is reasonable to conclude the instructions could have misled…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. HebertSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. ZongkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. State v. GomezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  5. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API