Legal Opinion

People v. Mayo

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 2006No. B180282PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

The jury in this first degree murder case was instructed the People have the burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements of murder; defendant Quentin Mayo must be found not guilty of murder in the first degree unless the jury concludes beyond a reasonable doubt the murder was deliberate and premeditated; and resolution of Mayo’s guilt must be based on the evidence presented and not on facts outside the evidence or inferences derived from the fact of Mayo’s arrest or resulting trial. Apparently through an oversight, however, the trial court failed to…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People Ex Rel. Reisig v. AcunaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. ArandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. (HC) Diaz v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API