People v. Aranda
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
It is a fundamental precept of our criminal justice system that before a jury may convict a defendant of a criminal offense, it must find that the prosecution has proved all elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. State law and the federal Constitution require the trial court to instruct with regard to this fundamental principle when it advises the jurors of the applicable rules of law that govern their deliberation and decision. In California, a trial court ordinarily satisfies this obligation by instructing the jury under one of two “pattern” or…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- People v. Jones, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. BoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. CapistranoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. SivongxxayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. AnzaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.