Legal Opinion

In Re Higgins

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1943No. 35403PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith', J.

Although the maintenance of a bar comprised only of members worthy to be entrusted with the varied responsibilities, which the active practice of the law imposes upon its ministers, is recognized as essential to the preservation of what we understand in this country to be good government, experience in the past has shown that the elimination of those who have proved themselves unworthy has been one of our most difficult tasks and one which the public has regarded, with some justification, as not having been well or fully performed.

Lawyers deal every day with problems which the frailties and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. Bar Ass'n v. GreenhoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Ex parte CashinMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  4. In Re SteenMississippi Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In re Disbarment of PooleMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ethics Com'n v. Committee on Prof. Resp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re FoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In re Disbarment of PrisockMississippi Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API