Legal Opinion

Kearse v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 30, 2003No. 1D02-1606PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, James Kearse, raises three issues on appeal, one of which we find dispositive. Before a pre-trial suppression hearing, Kearse unequivocally requested that he be allowed to represent himself. The trial court denied the appellant’s request without conducting a Faretta hearing. In Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), the Supreme Court held that a defendant has an affirmative right to present his own defense. A trial court may not impose counsel on a “literate, competent, and understanding” defendant that has voluntarily waived his right to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. State v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Harden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Jeffry R. Dickerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. Berryhill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API