Kearse v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant, James Kearse, raises three issues on appeal, one of which we find dispositive. Before a pre-trial suppression hearing, Kearse unequivocally requested that he be allowed to represent himself. The trial court denied the appellant’s request without conducting a Faretta hearing. In Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), the Supreme Court held that a defendant has an affirmative right to present his own defense. A trial court may not impose counsel on a “literate, competent, and understanding” defendant that has voluntarily waived his right to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goldsmith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Harden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Jeffry R. Dickerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Berryhill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.