Harden v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtFernandez, J.
Gregg M. Harden appeals his conviction for two counts of attempted robbery and one count of furnishing false information to a law enforcement officer during an investigation. Because the trial court committed per se reversible error when it failed to conduct a Faretta hearing after Harden made several unequivocal requests to represent himself, we reverse and remand for a new trial. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).
Harden filed numerous motions and pleadings with the trial court waiving his right to counsel and requesting self-representation.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Tennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Kearse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Sams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3Cited by5 opinions
- Deferrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- State v. Templar-O'BrienDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Clifton Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- TAVARIS DONTE SERVANTS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022