Legal Opinion

Harden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 2014No. 3D11-3239PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFernandez, J.

Gregg M. Harden appeals his conviction for two counts of attempted robbery and one count of furnishing false information to a law enforcement officer during an investigation. Because the trial court committed per se reversible error when it failed to conduct a Faretta hearing after Harden made several unequivocal requests to represent himself, we reverse and remand for a new trial. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).

Harden filed numerous motions and pleadings with the trial court waiving his right to counsel and requesting self-representation.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Tennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. Kearse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Sams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deferrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. State v. Templar-O'BrienDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Clifton Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. TAVARIS DONTE SERVANTS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API