Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark Spudic and Rutilo Ochoa
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 11, 1986No. 85-2282, 85-2283PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This case arises from a twenty-seven count indictment returned on January 17, 1985, charging seven defendants 1 with various crimes growing out of their business or procuring and marketing stolen motor vehicles in interstate commerce, 2 their specialty being vans and pickup trucks. Only two of the defendants, Ochoa and Spudic, are involved in this appeal after being found guilty in a jury trial. 3
Spudic complains that the counts charging interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle and the counts charging concealment of the same motor vehicle are…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Irving L. NapueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. James L. Pless and Michael L. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Lonnie D. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Michael Francis Johnson, United States of America v. Ricardo Bernard SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.