Legal Opinion

Jex v. Labor Commission

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 5, 2012No. 20100674-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Judge:

T1 Layne Jex seeks judicial review of the Labor Commission's (the Commission) denial of workers' compensation benefits to him after he was injured while driving his personal vehicle from his workplace. Jex asserts that the denial was based on an erroneous determination that his vehicle was not an instrumentality of his employer's business. We decline to disturb the Commission's ruling.

BACKGROUND

T2 The facts of this case are essentially undisputed. 1 On June 2, 2008, Jex was hired by Precision Excavating (Precision) in St. George, Utah, as a heavy equipment operator. Jex…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Drake v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. STATE TAX COM'N v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bailey v. Utah State Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jex v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. North Fork Special Service District v. BennionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. Jex v. LBR CMMNUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Jex v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API