Mykhal Lloyd Polite v. TitleMax of Arizona Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Mykhal Lloyd Polite, No. CV-25-01574-PHX-JZB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 TitleMax of Arizona Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 16 (“Motion”). (Doc. 48.) For the following reasons, the Court will grant the Motion. 17 I. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS. 18 After Plaintiff defaulted on a loan agreement, Defendant repossessed his vehicle. 19 (Doc. 47 at 1); (doc. 50 at 1.) A third-party repossession company retrieved and stored the 20 vehicle. (Doc. 47-2…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.