Legal Opinion
Ducally v. State
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided November 8, 2002No. 2001-442-M.PPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Court for oral argument on September 24, 2002, pursuant to an order that had directed both parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised on this petition for certiorari should not be summarily decided. After considering the arguments of counsel and the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown, and shall proceed to decide the case at this time.
In this petition for certiorari, the state seeks review of a Superior Court order vacating two separate pleas of nolo conten-dere by defendant, Anthony Ducally…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wilkinson v. State Crime Laboratory CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Lawrence v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Rodrigues v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- Armenakes v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- State v. James Briggs. State v. Anna M. Matthias (Mathias)Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Tavarez v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- State v. Eileen MorriceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.