Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Snider v. Flynn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1996No. 69797PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

Relator/defendant seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent/judge from sentencing him in two matters. One is the revocation of probation, and the other is a trial. He contends that he was forced to represent himself in both matters in violation of his constitutional right to counsel. We issued a preliminary order in prohibition, which we now make absolute.

I

The first of these two matters, a misdemeanor stealing charge, arose in 1993. A November 1993 docket entry states, “Defendant does not qualify for public defender as defendant is not emancipated.”

Apparently,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. State v. EhlersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. May v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. State v. YardleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Tawanda KunongaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Winegar v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. KilburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. WilkersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Chevra Kadisha Cemetery Ass'n v. RenoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API