State ex rel. Snider v. Flynn
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Presiding Judge.
Relator/defendant seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent/judge from sentencing him in two matters. One is the revocation of probation, and the other is a trial. He contends that he was forced to represent himself in both matters in violation of his constitutional right to counsel. We issued a preliminary order in prohibition, which we now make absolute.
I
The first of these two matters, a misdemeanor stealing charge, arose in 1993. A November 1993 docket entry states, “Defendant does not qualify for public defender as defendant is not emancipated.”
Apparently,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. EhlersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- May v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- State v. YardleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Tawanda KunongaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Winegar v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. KilburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. WilkersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State ex rel. Chevra Kadisha Cemetery Ass'n v. RenoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.