Legal Opinion

Goff v. Kroger Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 7, 1986No. C-1-85-1350PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HERMAN JACOB WEBER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the several state claims which are pendent to the federal age discrimination claim in this case. Plaintiff opposes the dismissal of the pendent claims.

The basis for this Court’s jurisdiction arises from plaintiff’s claim of violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) in 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. as amended (1978). Since diversity is absent in this case, the age discrimination claims under Ohio Rev.Code § 4101.17 and the additional state claims are brought to this Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mitroff v. Xomox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Foltzer v. Lodge & Shipley Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCormick v. MaysDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  2. Pettis v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
  3. Thompson v. Midwest Foundation Independent Physicians Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
  4. Taylor v. Door to Door Transportation Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  5. Taber v. Christ HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API