Legal Opinion
Hines v. Energy XXI Services, LLC
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 1, 2019No. 4:17-cv-01505Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT October 01, 2019 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION JERMAINE HINES, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION H-17-1505 § ENERGY XXI SERVICES, LLC, et al § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is intervenors Fab-Con, Inc. (“Fab-Con”) and Signal Mutual Indemnity Association, Ltd.’s (“Signal”) (collectively, “Intervenors”) motion for summary judgment. Dkt. 119. After considering the motion, response, reply, record evidence, and the applicable law, the court finds that Intervenors’ motion should be GRANTED.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Environmental Conservation Organization v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Fordoche, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc., Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Carr v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Fontenot v. Chevron USA Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.