Legal Opinion

The State v. Oyeniyi

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 2016No. A15A1724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray, Judge.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Adeshye Oyeniyi’s motion to suppress the results of a State-administered chemical test of his breath obtained at the time of his arrest for driving under the influence. The State contends that the trial court erred in excluding the test results based on its finding that OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (b) (2), Georgia’s implied consent notice for suspects who are age 21 or over (“implied consent notice”), is inaccurate, misleading, and overstates the penalty for refusing to submit to the State-administered test. For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. State v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Sauls v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  4. Singleterry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKIBBEN v. THE STATECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. The State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. HERNANDEZ v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  4. The State v. Stroud.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API