Legal Opinion

State v. Buckingham

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1976No. File 11586Published

1Opinion of the Court

240 N.W.2d 84 (1976)

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Bruce F. BUCKINGHAM, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 11586.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

March 25, 1976.

Harry W. Christianson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, for plaintiff and respondent. William J. Janklow, Atty. Gen., Max A. Gors, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, on the brief.

Walter J. Bradsky, of Bangs, McCullen, Butler, Foye & Simmons, Rapid City, for defendant and appellant.

WOLLMAN, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury on a charge of driving while intoxicated. He appeals from the judgment of conviction, contending that the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API