Legal Opinion

State v. McMillan

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 16, 1928No. 12401PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

The defendants were jointly indicted at Greenville and were tried in the County Court. They were charged with maintaining a nuisance where liquor was allowed to be drunk in violation of Section 845 of the Criminal Code.

Setcion 845 of the Code is as follows:

“All places where persons are permitted to resort for the purpose of drinking alcoholic liquors or beverages are hereby declared nuisances, and the keeper or manager of such places, upon conviction, shall be punished,” etc.

The testimony showed that the defendants, husband and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Isom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. State v. Burns Et Ux.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. State v. HoustonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
  4. Thompson v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. LangleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. MinorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API