Legal Opinion
Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 24, 2025No. 1:24-cv-09918Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GOLDENEYE ADVISORS, LLC, Plaintiff, -v- 24-CV-9918 (VSB) (VF) OPINION & ORDER HANACO VENTURE CAPITAL, LTD., et al., Defendants. VALERIE FIGUEREDO, United States Magistrate Judge. Presently before the Court is a motion by non-party STL Namos LP (“STL Namos”) to intervene under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 for the limited purpose of moving to compel arbitration. ECF No. 21. Defendants Hanaco Venture Capital, LTD. (“Hanaco”), Lior Prosor, and David Frankel (collectively, “Defendants”) support intervention by STL Namos. To date,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Mastercard International Inc. v. Visa International Service Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Catanzano v. WingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.