Neff v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of being a “peeping Tom.” He appeals, enumerating error upon the general grounds and the trial court’s refusal to continue the trial of the case. Held:
1. Viewing the evidence in favor of the jury’s verdict, Webb v. State, 170 Ga. App. 115 (316 SE2d 561), we find the following: An eyewitness saw a man looking into several windows of a house. It was early in the morning and the house was occupied by two teenage girls. A second witness observed a man peeping into her bedroom windows and she chased him to a nearby house. The police were…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alderman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Grimes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Wilcoxen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rhinehart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987