Legal Opinion

Martin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 26, 1996No. 95-2708PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Finn Martin moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for permission to file an untimely appeal due to ineffective assistance of counsel. The District Court denied the motion based on the fact that Martin had pled guilty. Because Martin was entitled to appeal his sentence even though he pled guilty, and because the failure to file an appeal constituted ineffective assistance of counsel, we reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

Finn Martin was represented by Frank E. Freeman, a criminal defense attorney. Martin pled guilty to conspiracy to import cocaine and was sentenced to 169 months in prison. Martin claims that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fernando Fernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Manuel Barrientos A/K/A Manny Redmon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Roger Dale Ferguson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Montemoino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Hector Garcia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. RamseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. Castillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Marcus Sanders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API