Ives v. Tregent
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the Superior Court of Detroit.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The plaintiffs in error are assignees in bankruptcy of *391Bobert Hosie, and were sued in trover by Tregent for thé conversion of certain shares of stock in the Kellogg bridge company, of Buffalo, N. Y., which he claimed to have purchased of them at a public sale made of the effects of said bankrupt. The suit appears to- have grown out of a misunderstanding, real or pretended, between Tregent and the assignees, regarding the price at which the shares were struck off to him; Tregent claiming that it was eleven cents a share, while Ives, who was present at the sale, insists' that he understood it…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Russell v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Whitfield v. MayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
- Michigan National Bank v. Michigan Livestock ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Sheldon v. RoundsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.