Legal Opinion

Suntrana Mining Company v. Widich

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1961No. 11PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBETT, Chief Justice.

Appellant as well as appellees question the jurisdiction of this court to hear this appeal on grounds very similar to those raised in Hobbs v. State of Alaska, Alaska, 359 P.2d 956. Since the jurisdictional issues raised here have already been considered and decided in favor of the jurisdiction of this court in the opinion just referred to, it should suffice' to say that there is no lack of jurisdiction in this court to hear the present appeal.

The main question to be determined is whether the trial court properly submitted to the jury the interpretation of a disputed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Valentine v. QuackenbushCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HammerAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Madonna v. Tamarack Air, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API