Legal Opinion

People v. Finch, Pruyn & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hasbrouck, J.:

In 1905 and prior thereto one Zenas Van Dusen held title to and was the owner of a strip of land forty-five chains wide across the northerly end of township 13 in Totten and Crossfield’s Purchase in the county of Warren, N. Y.

The State employed one Frank L. Bell to investigate the title and to make recommendations as to its purchase. Having found the title in Van Dusen he was authorized by the Forest, Fish and *77Game Commission to acquire it for the State. He employed William H. Rice, because he was a cousin of Van Dusen’s, to conduct the negotiations. They resulted in a deed of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MinerNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  2. People v. . Santa Clara Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Herkimer Lumber Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. People v. Raquette Falls Land Co.New York Supreme Court · 1917
  5. People v. Brennan, New York County Courts1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carmichael v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Lee v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Williams Oil Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API