Legal Opinion

Tabor v. Tabor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1904No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 17 opinions

' Appeal from Oakland; Smith, J. Bill by William J. Tabor against Mary O. Tabor, Mayme A. Tabor, and others to restore a destroyed deed. From a decree for complainant, defendant Mary O. Tabor appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Complainant is the son of Moses E. Tabor, deceased. The first-named defendant is the stepmother of complainant, and the widow of said Moses. The second-named defendant is a daughter of the first, and a half-sister to complainant. Said defendant Mary C. Tabor executed a deed of certain property to Moses E. Tabor in his lifetime. About the time of the death of Moses E. Tabor, this deed was destroyed by defendant Mayme A. Tabor at the instance of defendant Mary.., This suit is brought to compel defendant Mary to execute a second deed which gives to complainant the rights which he would, as heir,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hayes v. LivingstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Dawson v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Nims v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Stevens v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Dyer v. SkadanMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schofield v. GoldArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wipfler v. WipflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Habrich v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gibbs v. PotterIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Nord v. NordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API