Legal Opinion

Kansas City v. Wiskur

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1961No. 23265PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROADDUS, Judge.

On April 1, 1960, an information was filed in the Municipal Court of Kansas City charging the defendant Wiskur with the violation of Section 39-300 of the Revised Ordinances of said city. The above numbered ordinance relates to indecent acts, exhibitions and conduct. Defendant was convicted in the Municipal Court and fined $100. He appealed to the Circuit Court where the judgment of conviction was affirmed. Defendant thereafter perfected his appeal to this court.

An examination of the information will disclose that it sets forth no facts charging an offense. And there can be no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. City of St. Louis v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Pettus v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. In Re John E. CorveyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. StricklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. City of Raytown v. RoachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Kansas City v. FranklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. City of St. Louis v. FlynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. City of Independence v. KirchoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API