Legal Opinion

Allen-Bradley Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1973No. 351PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Was the defendant required to show “good cause” for refusing to work on a different shift in order to continue to receive unemployment compensation benefits ? The circuit court held that she was. The department held that she was not required to show “good cause” for turning down a second-shift job offered by the employer for whom she had earlier worked.

Three statutes are involved in answering the question posed.

The first is sec. 108.04 (8) (a), Stats., providing:

“Suitable work, (a) If an employe fails either to apply for work when notified by a public employment office or to accept work when…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. VOCATION. TECH. &ADULT ED. DIST. 13 v. ILHR Dept.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. A. O. Smith Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Vocational, Technical & Adult Education, District 13 v. Department of IndustryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Campos v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Kosmos Cement Co., Inc. v. HaneyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API