Allen-Bradley Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Was the defendant required to show “good cause” for refusing to work on a different shift in order to continue to receive unemployment compensation benefits ? The circuit court held that she was. The department held that she was not required to show “good cause” for turning down a second-shift job offered by the employer for whom she had earlier worked.
Three statutes are involved in answering the question posed.
The first is sec. 108.04 (8) (a), Stats., providing:
“Suitable work, (a) If an employe fails either to apply for work when notified by a public employment office or to accept work when…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- VOCATION. TECH. &ADULT ED. DIST. 13 v. ILHR Dept.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- A. O. Smith Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Vocational, Technical & Adult Education, District 13 v. Department of IndustryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Campos v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Kosmos Cement Co., Inc. v. HaneyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.