Legal Opinion

Birdsell Mfg. Co. v. Anderson

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 2, 1937No. 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, District Judge.

This is an action by the Birdsell Manufacturing Company against A. M. Anderson, receiver of the National Bank of Kentucky, seeking to , recover of him $41,481.74, and is submitted on demurrer to the petition.

On April 24, 1930, the plaintiff, then engaged in the manufacture of farm wagons at South Bend, Ind., under the trade names of “Old Hickory,” “Tennessee,” and “Studebaker,” entered into an agreement with the Kentucky Wagon Manufacturing Company to engage it to 'manufacture farm wagons under the above trade-names, the plaintiff to discontinue this branch of its…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Investment Company Institute v. CampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  2. Fruit Industries v. Bisceglia Bros. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Acker v. Provident National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Fruit Industries v. Bisceglia Bros. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API