Legal Opinion

State v. . Gardner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

This case was before us on a former appeal in which a new trial was granted. S. v. Gardner, 226 N. C., 310, 37 S. E. (2d), 913.

The first assignment of error is based on an exception to the admission of the testimony, over objection, of the Acting Coroner of Buncombe County, Dr. Curtis Crump, who, in response to a question about a telephone call, testified: “I received that telephone call shortly after 3 :30 p.m., and Dr. Gardner, or a man purporting to be Dr. Gardner, stated that he had called his lawyer and his lawyer had advised him to call the Coroner concerning a deceased individual which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. T. Griffin Manufacturing Co. v. BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Sanders v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. State v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . BurlesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Powers v. . Commercial Service Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. King v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API