Legal Opinion
D.B. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 12, 2010No. 4D08-3649PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
A juvenile appeals the denial of his motion to suppress after entering a no contest plea to charges of burglary of a dwelling, grand theft, and criminal mischief greater than $1,000. He argues the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress because he was not given Miranda1 warnings. We agree and reverse.
The juvenile was originally thought to be a witness to a burglary. A detective interviewed him at his home with his mother present. During that interview, the juvenile provided a name and positive photo identification of a suspect.
That suspect then inculpated the juvenile in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- State v. GlatzmayerSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Meredith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- B.M.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. E.W.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Bowen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- DB v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010