Legal Opinion

In re Walters

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 4, 1948No. 5440PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfeeld, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 17 and 18 in appellant’s application for a patent for an invention on a magnetic core, on the ground of lack of invention over the prior art. Claims 1, 3, 8 to 18, inclusive, 19 and 20 of the application have been allowed.

The appealed claims read:

17. In a magnetic core, an annealed core body comprising magnetic particles and an inorganic insulating binder, and a protective envelope enclosing said body, said protective envelope comprising a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minton Mfg. Co. v. Continental Briar Pipe Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. In re CaseyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  4. In re LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re MasonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Matter of the Application of William C. MasonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API