Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Mora-Higuera

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 11, 2001No. 00-3037, 00-3254PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Antonio Botello and Jose Mora-Higuera were indicted on multiple counts, including conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1994). Botello went to trial and was convicted on the conspiracy charge. He now appeals his conviction, arguing that he was the subject of an illegal vehicle stop, that there was insufficient evidence to convict him, that the issue of drug quantity should have been submitted to the jury, and that the district court 1 erred when it allowed the government to comment on his ability to speak English and use leading…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Jose Alberto Mora-Higuera, Also Known as Mario Ruiz-Armenta, United States of America v. Antonio Botello, Also Known as Antonio Benitez BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API