Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Alberto Mora-Higuera, Also Known as Mario Ruiz-Armenta, United States of America v. Antonio Botello, Also Known as Antonio Benitez Botello

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 11, 2001No. 00-3037Published

1Opinion of the Court

269 F.3d 905 (8th Cir. 2001)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

JOSE ALBERTO MORA-HIGUERA, ALSO KNOWN AS MARIO RUIZ-ARMENTA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

ANTONIO BOTELLO, ALSO KNOWN AS ANTONIO BENITEZ BOTELLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 00-3037, 00-3254

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Submitted: May 14, 2001

Filed: October 11, 2001

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Before Loken, John R. Gibson, and Murphy, Circuit Judges.

John R.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API