Legal Opinion

United States v. Fradkin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 9, 1935No. 51PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The defendant James J. Fradkin was indicted with five other persons for using, and for conspiring to use, the mails in a scheme to defraud. Together with Julius Lehrenkrauss and Charles F. Lehrenkrauss he was convicted of substantive offenses under fifteen counts of the indictment and was also convicted under the conspiracy count. The defendant Fradkin alone appeals.

In the spring of 1932 Fradkin had several conversations with Juliüs Lehrenkrauss, who said the partnership of Lehrenkrauss & Sons needed additional working capital. As a result of these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Riper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Silkworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  3. Bentel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  4. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. GottfriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. Clyde L. Schaffer and James H. Devenny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. Helen A. Davenport v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API