Legal Opinion
Hamelin v. Foulkes
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1930No. Docket No. 6847PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
An action for personal injuries was brought by Ethel Hamelin, respondent, against Edward T. Foulkes, H. C. Swanson and H. C. Swanson Company. A motion for nonsuit was granted as to the defendant Foulkes. The jury rendered a verdict in the sum, of $10,000 in favor of respondent and against the appellants H. C. Swanson and H. C. Swanson Company. This appeal is taken from a judgment entered upon the verdict.
Respondent sustained her injuries on the night of November 6, 1926. While alighting from an automobile she stepped into an open hole in the sidewalk occasioned by failure to maintain a proper…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Runyon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Rider v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Marshall v. Ransome Concrete Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Salt Lake City v. SchubachUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Larson v. Blue & White Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.