Legal Opinion

Bufford v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1932No. 5 Div. 837PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

«* * * The decision of the trial court, refusing to grant a new trial on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence, or that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, will not be reversed, unless, after allowing all reasonable presumptions of its correctness, the preponderance of the evidence against the verdict is so decided as to clearly convince the court that it is wrong and unjust.” Cobb v. Malone & Collins, 92 Ala. 630, 9 So. 738, 740.

Paraphrasing the quoted rule, laid down originally for the guidance of the Supreme Court, but now, as well, for this court (Code 1923, § 7318), it is,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Norwood Hospital v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. McTyeire v. McGaughySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Lassiter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Bailey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Hunt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API