Legal Opinion
Brody v. Hankin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 14, 2004No. 2:03-cv-04739PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Via the motion now pending before this Court, Defendants move to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and on the grounds that it is barred by the principles of res judica-ta and/or collateral estoppel. For the reasons outlined below, the motion shall be granted.
Factual Background
This case arises out of three real estate partnerships in which the plaintiffs had purchased limited partnership interests in 1983. Those partnerships, Han Mar Associates XIV, XVIII and XXI, were formed by the defendant Mark Hankin, who was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Randall v. Bank One National Ass'n (In Re Randall)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Faust v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (In Re Faust)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Antonucci v. CarboneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Petito v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANYUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Reed v. WilliamsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.