D'Arcy & Associates, Inc. v. K.P.M.G. Peat Marwick, L.L.P.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
D’Arcy and Associates, Inc., appeals the circuit court’s two summary judgments granted separately for K.P.M.G. Peat Mar-wick, L.L.P., on D’Arcy’s claims for tor-tious interference and fraud. Because D’Arcy’s tortious interference claims were time-barred, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment on those claims. The parties are disputing material factual issues concerning D’Arcy’s fraud claims; therefore, we reverse the circuit court’s judgment on those claims.
D’Arcy’s business was to help other businesses obtain tax benefits. On June 11, 1990, D’Arcy agreed to help Vi-Jon…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Klemme v. BestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Heberer v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dual v. Lockheed Martin CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- James Wong v. Bann-Cor MortgageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Effs v. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Cook v. DeSoto Fuels, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Jerry Washington v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.