Legal Opinion
Tabas v. Mullane
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 10, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-309, 84-406 and 84-776PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this derivative action under the court’s diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Defendants also move, in the alternative, to stay this proceeding pending the disposition of a similar action in the Delaware Chancery Court. The court heard oral argument on these motions on November 16, 1984. Having considered the submissions and arguments of the parties, and for the reasons provided below, this court will deny…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- Levitt v. Riddell Sports, Inc. (In Re MacGregor Sporting Goods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Brickman v. Tyco Toys, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Kaufman v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Paglin v. Saztec International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.