Legal Opinion

McCurry v. Singh

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 2024No. C098433Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/26/24; certified for publication 9/10/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- DANIEL MCCURRY et al., C098433 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2020- 00276858-CU-MM-GDS) v. INDER SINGH, Defendant and Respondent. Summary judgment in favor of a defendant in a professional malpractice action is proper where the plaintiff does not show that the defendant owed the plaintiff a legal duty of care. (Armato v. Baden (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 885, 893.) A physician does not owe a duty of care until a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API