Legal Opinion

Spurlock v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1969No. Civ. 9207PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, J.

Petitioner was charged with violations of Vehicle Code, sections 20002 (failure of driver of vehicle involved in accident to stop to identify himself and ascertain the owner of the damaged property), and 23102 (misdemeanor drunk driving), as the result of incidents occurring on the night of August 13, 1967. Petitioner pleaded guilty to the section 20002 violation, and the charges relative to section 23102 were dismissed.

Subsequently, petitioner was notified that, pursuant to Vehicle Code, section 13353, subdivision (b), her privilege to operate a motor vehicle on the highways…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977
  3. Buchanan v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Anderson v. CozensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Brown v. ValverdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API