Legal Opinion

Erne v. Goshen Veneer, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

(Pro Tempore).

The plaintiff in circuit court sued to foreclose its mechanics’ lien for material and labor furnished in construction upon a two-acre site adjacent to and a part of Goshen Veneer, Inc., in Lane County. Defendants were Goshen Veneer, Inc.; Reese Wingard, who held a first mortgage on the premises involved; Delbert S. Jones and Ruth I. Jones, dba Casey Jones Well Drilling Company, hereinafter referred to as Jones, who had filed a lien upon the same tract for drilling a well thereon; and Vik Industrial Co., which had done construction work on the property, brought action and taken…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Osborn v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Western Well Works, Inc. v. California Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Gaines v. ChildersOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Portland Mortgage Co. v. Creditors Protective Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Auld v. StarbardOregon Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Chandler & Newville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Hooker Creek Companies v. Central Oregon Land Development, Inc.Deschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Hickey v. PolacheckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Minter-Wilson Drilling Co. v. RichinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. SulejmanagicOregon Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API