Legal Opinion
Sterling v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 1997No. 93-CF-1035, 93-CF-1112, 93-CF-961PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge:
Appellants, Ervin Sterling, James Hampton and Michael Epps, were charged with assault with intent to kill while armed with a stick and shod foot (D.C.Code §§ 22-501, - 3202 (1996)), mayhem while armed with a stick and shod foot (D.C.Code §§ 22-506, - 3202 (1996)) and malicious destruction of property (D.C.Code § 22-403 (1996)). At a joint trial, appellants were convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon (shod foot), mayhem while armed (shod foot), and malicious destruction of property. Each of the appellants argues for reversal on the grounds that: (1) the evidence was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Castillo-Campos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hammond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.