Legal Opinion

Rosenkoff v. Finkelstein

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 6, 1952No. 11209_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant’s “Complaint for Money Damages for Unjust Enrichment and Malicious Interference With Contract Rights” alleges that appellees gave appellant an option to buy certain land and afterwards sold the land at a higher price to a man whom, as appellant had told appellees, appellant had interested in buying it. Though appellant is, in the District of Columbia, a licensed broker, he says he was not acting as a broker. The land is in Maryland.

The alleged option was oral. Appellant does not deny that an option to buy land is required by the ■ statute of frauds to be in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kresge v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
  2. De Grazia v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dryden v. Tri-Valley GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Monument Realty LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. Business Equipment Center, Ltd. v. DeJur-Amsco Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  4. Snyder v. HillegeistCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Snyder v. HillegeistCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API