Legal Opinion
Boston Edison Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 10, 2012No. Nos. 99-447C, 03-2626CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
The claims of Boston Edison Company (“Boston Edison”) and Entergy Nuclear Generation Co. (“Entergy”) relate to storage of spent nuclear fuel (“SNF”) and have a long history in this court. Boston Edison sold Entergy the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in Plymouth, Massachusetts in 1999, and both have sued the United States (“the government”) for breach of contract because the Department of Energy (“DOE”) has failed in its statutory and contractual obligations to dispose of the plant’s spent nuclear fuel. Since Boston Edison instituted suit in 1999 and Entergy filed…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- John E. Johnson and H/w Ann Marie Johnson v. The Celotex Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles D. Finch v. U.S. Banik, N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Entergy Nuclear Generation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Beberman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Boston Edison CompanyUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.