Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 5, 1972No. 11870PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the court below, sitting without a jury, denying issuance of a writ of mandamus to the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists and its Chairman, ordering them to certify Appellant as a psychologist under the Psychologists’ Certification and Licensing Act. Appellant has duly perfected his appeal to this Court.

We affirm.

Appellant’s first point of error is that of the court in refusing to issue the above described writ.

*376We overrule this point.

Article 4512c, sec. 20 (Supp.1970-71) Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes provides for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brazosport Saving & Loan Ass'n v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. County of Cameron v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. English Freight Co. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Gerard v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. O'Brien v. AmermanTexas Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Texas State Board of Examiners of PsychologistsTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Martine v. BD. OF REGENTS, STATE SR. COLLEGES, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Mull v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Simms v. Lakewood Village Property Owners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Secretary of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API