Legal Opinion
Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Leverentz
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1927No. 7580PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error from a judgment on verdict according damages for personal injuries.
The point is made that this writ should be dismissed because application therefor was not made within three months from entry of judgment. The judgment was entered December 10, 1925, as follows:
“Wherefore, in accordance with said verdict, it is by the court considered, ordered and adjudged, that the plaintiff herein, Carl P. Leverentz, as administrator of the estate of Carl Edward Leverentz, do have and recover of and from defendant herein, Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Conboy v. First Nat. Bank of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Jehiel Brooks, in Error v. Samuel NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mortgage Loan Co. v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Clarke v. Hot Springs Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Suggs v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Northwestern Public Service Co. v. PfeiferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.