Spampinato v. M. Breger & Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District judge.
This is a motion on behalf of defendants M. Breger & Co., Inc. and Miles Breger to dismiss, as to them, the amended complaint filed August 1, 1958, on the ground that this Court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the cause of action alleged therein against said defendants. The “Memorandum” in support of the motion consists merely of argument without the citation of a single pertinent statute, rule or judicial decision. The “Memorandum” of the plaintiff, a layman, did not aid the Court, despite his apparent attempt to cite' cases which, in his opinion, were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Collins v. HardymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mitchell v. GreenoughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Love v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Laughlin v. RosenmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Miles v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas O. Spampinato v. The City of New York and Guenther E. WinklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Spampinato v. M. Breger & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Egan v. City of AuroraDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- Spampinato v. M. Breger & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Spampinato v. Breger & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959