Legal Opinion

Gaillardanne v. Locascio

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 27, 1935No. 33329PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

Plaintiff, as the holder of two past-due mortgage notes of $500 each, sued out executory process against defendant, the maker of the notes and the granter of the mortgage, seizing the mortgaged property.

While the property was being advertised for sale by the civil sheriff, the defendant took a rule on the plaintiff to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue, restraining the seizure and sale, on the grounds, first, that the notes sued on were paid and the mortgage canceled by the subsequent execution of a new note and mortgage for $1,340, and, secondly, that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Continental Asphalt & Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. A. Baldwin & Co. v. McCainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Lhote & Co. v. Church Extension Soc. of Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  4. Edwards v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  5. Scott v. HowellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reeves v. BarbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Frierson v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Tucker v. WoodsideSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. Cannella v. Succession of CannellaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  5. Torres v. SerpasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API