Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Arenstein & Huston

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Baer, Jr., J.

This application in the continuing saga of a law firm’s demise deals with several matters, but will be treated as a motion to fix and pay interim commissions to the temporary receiver and interim fees to an accountant* pursuant to CPLR *4926401 and 8004. The original application was made on August 25, 1987 by Charles McGuiness, who was appointed as the receiver by a Justice of this court on July 5, 1985 at the request of the petitioner, Arenstein, in connection with the dissolution of the law firm Arenstein and Huston, P. C. (A&H).

This motion raises…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of T. J. Ronan Paint Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. KoralekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. In re the Dissolution of F. G. A. Concrete Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. Mackenzie v. Marine Midland Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API